Thinking Beyond Human
2 Corinthians 5:16-21
The mystery and ministry of reconciliation
5:16 From now on, therefore, we regard no one from a human point of view; even though we once knew Christ from a human point of view, we no longer know him in that way.
5:17 So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation: everything old has passed away; look, new things have come into being!
5:18 All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and has given us the ministry of reconciliation;
5:19 that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting the message of reconciliation to us.
5:20 So we are ambassadors for Christ, since God is making his appeal through us; we entreat you on behalf of Christ: be reconciled to God.
5:21 For our sake God made the one who knew no sin to be sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.
One of my dearest Lay Leaders—the late Robert Harper, Esq.—used to tease me after the Sunday sermon with “You have the most ‘favorite scripture passages’ of any pastor I’ve known.” I think about that comment often, and it makes me chuckle, especially as it causes me to remember Bob. He and I had an “unusual” relationship, in that I think I was an enigma to him, for many reasons. I was appointed to his church—the Coraopolis UMC—after my five-year stint as an associate pastor at St. Paul’s, alongside Ron Hoellein and Leah Bergstrom. It was my practice to study the history of a church and its community after being appointed there, so I could begin to build trust with the new congregation. Coraopolis UMC wise RIPE with great history, as the church was founded by the Rev. Josiah Dillon, who had a sweet thing for the daughter—Cora Watson--of the industrialist who basically founded what became Coraopolis, originally called Middletown. They soon married, and Dillon suggested changing the name TO “Coraopolis,” because there already was a “Middletown” in the region. Did he name it “Coraopolis” because of his love for Cora? Historians will tell you that, since Dillon was a Greek scholar, he chose “Cora-opolis,” as “cora” means young maiden, and “polis” obviously means “city.” Hence, “Coraopolis” means “City of the young maiden,” or just “maiden city.” Personally, having read more about Dillon, I would say the answer is BOTH. He was a clever and brilliant fellow, and the name “Maiden City” would be loved and accepted by the populus as honorable, AND it served to honor his young bride, as well. It CERTAINLY didn’t hurt that her dad—the wealthy industrialist—would love it as well. Bob Harper was absolutely thrilled that I knew all of this, and more, before my feet hit the pavement in Coraopolis. I was also an enigma to Harper because I was opinionated in ways that didn’t always jibe with his considerably educated opinions, and yet, I could hold my own in an intellectual discussion. Bob loved to do little cartoon drawings from his post in the choir behind the preacher. My “colorful” sermonizing style provided plenty of fodder for his penciled musings, many of which he would pass on to me on his way out. I’ve often wondered about the “editorial” cartoons he drew but never showed me…
I digress, (as usual). Again, one of Bob’s comments was about how almost every week I would pronounce that week’s lectionary passage as “one of my favorites.” Honestly, and without reservation, THIS passage from II Corinthians IS one of my favorites, if not the one at the top of the list, the least of which is that I know it is “Second Corinthians,” not “Two Corinthians.” This text is truly another “Gospel in miniature.” One of my favorite seminary professors, Dr. Robert Kelley, used to describe John 3:16, thusly, but I think this one gives it a run for its money, coming in second only because Paul wrote it, rather than it coming from the lips of Jesus. For me, the phrase: “…in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself…” in verse 19. That God sent the Son, Jesus Christ, to reconcile—fully accept and restore a relationship with—the WORLD, is huge. The WORLD object in this text says to me something that shoots down any idea that there is some magic prayer or “confession” that a person must say or make to become “saved.” People—of any tongue, nation, or even religion—are SAVED because of what God has done in Jesus Christ. THIS is God’s action, not ours, nor are we the gatekeepers of who may benefit from this eternal “gift.” AND it indicates that God CONTINUES to “save the world,” which is why we believe in a risen Christ, who, along with the Holy Spirit, is STILL WORKING for the goal that “none should perish.” AND we are not given to fully understand just how and in how many ways God is doing this reconciling work! Might the Christ be working wherever people are seeking God, however they understand God? Might the Christ be working his salvific miracle wherever people are being imperiled by war or hunger or hate? Might the Christ be the one opening doors, hearts, and minds to persons who have been historically marginalized by their sexual orientation or identity? Might the Christ be at work even in the hearts of those who think that what we have been “entrusted with” is not this reconciliation (as the passage says) but some kind of evangelical “gatekeeping,” making sure that only folk who “do it their way” get into the kingdom? The answer to all of these questions to Paul is a resounding YES! It was to the theologian Karl Barth, too, who wrote that Christ was God’s great YES to the world. He got this passage. The danger in wanting to layer dogmas and doctrines on top of “who gets in and who gets excluded” is that one doing this is “thinking from a human point of view.”
Now, none of us can truly think from God’s point of view, but we do have some clues as to God’s mindset from the pages of holy writ:
*II Peter 3:9 says that God wishes that “none should perish.” “None” is pretty definitive.
*John 3:16 says, “For God so loved the world that God gave God’s only Son, that WHOSOEVER believes in him will not perish, but have everlasting life.” That God “gave” or “sent” the Son into the world reminds us that it is the SON’S salvific work that has been unleashed, not ours.
*Paul said that we could tap the “mind of Christ” in Philippians 2:5
*Summarizing what Jesus taught and did: forgiving; saving; healing; and bringing about God’s Kingdom as a Beloved Community
It is the HUMAN mindset or point of view that gets us into trouble with the goals and mission of God in Christ Jesus. The human point of view goes something like this:
*The human point of view is territorial; it circles the wagons and defends
*The human point of view prioritizes VERY differently than the “mind of Christ,” often giving the highest priorities to the one doing the thinking, handicapping others
*The human point of view tends toward self-centeredness, which is ultimately the “original sin”
*The human point of view builds walls, while the “mind of Christ” builds bridges and tears DOWN walls
*The human point of view is tribal; the “mind of Christ” has one tribe
In our day, “A.I.,” or “Artificial Intelligence” is both all the rage, and is CAUSING rage. Some see it as the technological boon to humankind, while others view it as the roots of our undoing. What about A.I.?
Computers can’t actually “think” in the manner of the human brain, but as they have become faster and able to access the monumental about of data available via the Internet, they are able to compile thoughts with this data to "appear” to think, or at least mimic human thought. HOWEVER, as humans seem to be eschewing critical thinking and are just accepting the opinions of others rather readily, A.I. is looking smarter, by comparison. It ISN’T, so don’t be fooled. Instead, BOOST YOUR OWN THINKING! A serious problem with A.I. and what it generates is that we dull our own thinking and accept what it spews out. By doing so, the best offerings of both humanity and technology are greatly diminished. Like a good source for a writer, or a great proofreader, for that matter, so A.I. may be a useful tool, but it is just a tool. I’ve read a few sermons written by A.I. and their store-bought cookies at best. Do your own work, preachers. Do your own work.
If we are to successfully “think beyond human,” or at least beyond our human limits, we start by seeking the “mind of Christ,” which is available to us because our Christ lives, and speaks his truth through the Holy Spirit. For the pew Christian, this means chucking your prejudices and “accepted” views of the world, knowing God has higher aims than writing off people. God would rather save and include them, as is clear from the pages of scripture. For the preacher, this means use your best exegetical tools and do your own work, in terms of writing your weekly sermon, AND expect that the Holy Spirit will join you in the preparation of same. It is both our calling AND our joy to help our people “think beyond human,” especially about life’s most important challenges and opportunities. Paul and the other “filterers” of God’s Word gave it their best shot; now it’s our turn, and our time.
And remember, thinking beyond human means being in pursuit of God’s ultimate truth. Don’t believe the lies that are being pumped out even faster than content from Chat GPT! Put your trust in Christ and the Holy Spirit, and do your critical thinking homework, Dear Ones! In deference to Maltese psychologist and philosopher, Dr. Edward de Bono, it’s time to “put on your thinking caps!”